CLAIM-120007reported
“Ledger and Styles report that by the morning of October 5 the Rescue Coordination Center had eliminated a missing-aircraft explanation and was referring to the object as a UFO. They later located a priority message from RCC Halifax to Canadian Forces Headquarters stating that a UFO had impacted the waters of Shag Harbour and naming RCMP personnel among the witnesses.”
CLAIM-120008reported
“The authors describe a priority telex from Canadian Maritime Command to the Fleet Diving Unit Atlantic ordering a diving officer and three divers to search for an object reported by the RCMP approximately three hundred yards offshore. In the document, the word UFO was prominently emphasized.”
CLAIM-120009reported
“The book states that Royal Canadian Navy divers searched the sound beginning October 6 and that Canadian Forces Maritime Command ended the official search on October 9 without publicly reporting a recovered object or definitive explanation.”
CLAIM-120012reported
“A retired air-force source called “Jim” in the book said he had served aboard a naval vessel near Shelburne as part of an aircraft-identification team and overheard divers insisting that the submerged target was not a submarine. Another retired ELINT source called “Terry” described a week of unusual Canadian-American coastal missions dropping sonar buoys near Shelburne. Neither account is presented with independently verifiable identities in the book.”
CLAIM-590013reported
“The book emphasizes that Wickens and other initial callers thought an aircraft had crashed; the RCMP and RCC began with a rescue/aircraft-loss problem rather than a civilian claim of an alien craft.”
CLAIM-590014disputed
“Chapter Eight quotes the RCMP record as “Baccaro Radar - Negative.””
CLAIM-590015reported
“The book describes Condon-project investigator Norman Levine as contacting Maritime Command and RCMP, after which the case was dropped because the official search was considered immediate and thorough; Condon classified it unexplained.”
CLAIM-590016disputed
“Styles found that an archival file group had documented “significant deletions” in July 1994; he interpreted the reduced file as possibly sanitized.”
Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.