ANOMALY
ARCHIVE / 001
SCIENTIFIC UAP ARCHIVE
POSTGRESQL RUNTIME AUTHORITY · 1,400+ VERIFIED DOSSIERS · 8,800+ CITED CLAIMS

Evidence-first catalogue of unidentified aerial phenomena, non-human intelligence profiles, and radar-tracked encounters, cross-referenced with declassified intelligence and cited bibliography.

DIRECT ARCHIVE ENTRY POINTS:🛸 Radar-Tracked Crafts (Tic Tac, Disc, Triangle)👤 Non-Human Intelligence & Species Profiles⚡ Landmark Phenomena & Flaps📍 Geospatial Encounter Map (550+ Mapped Records)
LEVEL 01 // ARCHIVE CLASSIFICATION SELECTOR
LEVEL 02 // SPECIES MORPHOLOGY FAMILIES
POSTGRESQL INDEX / 10 RECORDS
LEVEL 03 // ARCHIVAL CASE RECORD [S-000088]
S-000088CASE RECORD · CLASSIFICATION: ENTITYTERM-000116 (Humanlike UFO Occupant (Report Category))

VILLAS-BOAS HUMANLIKE WOMAN (1957 REPORT)

Humanlike female figure in the Villas-Boas account, described with whitish blond hair, wide face, prominent cheekbones, pointed chin and large outward-slanting blue eyes. Stored as reported testimony rather than evidence of extraterrestrial biology.

ANOMALY REFERENCE PICTOGRAM
REFERENCE ONLY — NOT WITNESS ARTWORK
// ARCHIVE SNAPSHOT
S-000088 / TERM-000116
PUBLISHED CLAIMS
8
VARIANTS
0
ENCOUNTERS
1
UNIQUE SOURCES
1
UNIQUE WORKS
1
HISTORICAL RANGE
1957
// RECURRING REPORTED CHARACTERISTICS
0 / RECORDS

No recurring controlled-vocabulary characteristic has enough published cited data to summarize yet.

// EVIDENCE PROFILE
8 PUBLISHED CLAIMS
Reported7
Disputed1
HOW CLAIM STATUS WORKS →
// REPRESENTATIVE VARIANTS
0 VARIANTS

No narrower variants are currently documented for this family.

// REPRESENTATIVE ENCOUNTERS
1 ENCOUNTERS
Antonio Villas Boas Minas Gerais Abduction Account
E-009801 · October 15, 1957
// SOURCE COVERAGE
8 CITATION LINKS
UNIQUE SOURCES
1
UNIQUE WORKS
1
PRIMARY SOURCES
0
CITATION LINKS
8
SOURCE RELIABILITY METHODOLOGY →

This family groups reports by recurring described morphology. Membership is descriptive and does not establish a biological species, ancestry, or origin.

Reported testimony; the witness’s own reproductive/origin interpretations are not canonicalized.