When and where was Pascagoula Hickson-Parker Abduction Account documented?

This encounter was documented on October 11, 1973 in Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States.

What sources and physical claims back the Pascagoula Hickson-Parker Abduction Account record?

The ANOMALY archive indexes 1 independent source citations across 18 claims, achieving a provenance completeness score of 71%.

← ENCOUNTERS DIRECTORY

E-009808LANDMARK CASE · HIGH CORROBORATIONDATE PRECISION: exactRECORD COMPLETENESS: 71%

Pascagoula Hickson-Parker Abduction Account

Name: Pascagoula Hickson-Parker Abduction Account
Start: October 11, 1973
Location: Pascagoula, United States

October 11, 1973Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States

Charles Hickson and Calvin Parker reported a hovering domed oval craft, stiff robot-like beings, immobilization and transport; Hickson described a scan-like examination before both men were returned.

// LINKED CLASSIFICATIONS:Ovoid / Egg / Oval / Football(C-000256)→Robotic / Mechanical Humanoids(S-000095)→

// PROVENANCE COVERAGE

71% record completeness

This measures documentation coverage, not whether the encounter or its claims are true.

1 SOURCES · 0 PRIMARY

Date documented

October 11, 1973

Location documented

Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States

Map coordinates available

No latitude/longitude is available for mapping.

Catalogue classification linked

2 family link(s), 2 case-specific component(s).

Published citation-backed claims

0 encounter-target claim(s), 18 component claim(s).

Source coverage

1 unique source edition(s); 0 marked primary for at least one claim.

Assessment has encounter-level provenance

Assessment fields exist, but no encounter-target published citation-backed claim currently supports them.

Assessment values are present without encounter-target published citation-backed claims. Treat the matrix as unprovenanced metadata until direct claims are added.

Witness totals are stored, but no encounter-level cited claim currently documents where those numbers came from.

This dossier currently depends on a single source edition; independent coverage would strengthen comparison.

No cited source is currently marked as primary for the published claims shown here.

// ASSESSMENT METADATA

Stored case-assessment fields

DIRECT PROVENANCE INCOMPLETE

Stored total witness estimate2

Stored verified-report count0

Instrumental evidence flagNO

Official investigation flagNO

These stored assessment values are shown transparently but should not be treated as source-backed facts until encounter-target claims cite their provenance.