SCIENTIFIC UAP ARCHIVE

POSTGRESQL RUNTIME AUTHORITY · 1,400+ VERIFIED DOSSIERS · 8,800+ CITED CLAIMS

Evidence-first catalogue of unidentified aerial phenomena, non-human intelligence profiles, and radar-tracked encounters, cross-referenced with declassified intelligence and cited bibliography.

DIRECT ARCHIVE ENTRY POINTS:🛸 Radar-Tracked Crafts (Tic Tac, Disc, Triangle)👤 Non-Human Intelligence & Species Profiles ⚡ Landmark Phenomena & Flaps 📍 Geospatial Encounter Map (550+ Mapped Records)

LEVEL 01 // ARCHIVE CLASSIFICATION SELECTOR

LEVEL 02 // CRAFT SHAPE FAMILIES

POSTGRESQL INDEX / 13 RECORDS

LEVEL 03 // ARCHIVAL CASE RECORD [C-000232]

C-000232CASE RECORD · CLASSIFICATION: CRAFTTERM-000121 (Luminous Ovoid / Oval Craft)

PAPUDA RADAR/VISUAL LUMINOUS OVAL (1991 REPORT)

Bright oval luminous object reported over Papuda, Brasília, by civilian and military-police witnesses and reportedly tracked by CINDACTA radar. Visual oval morphology is kept distinct from a controller’s statement that the radar return appeared rectangular on screen.

ANOMALY REFERENCE PICTOGRAM

REFERENCE ONLY — NOT WITNESS ARTWORK

Claims are grouped by attribute so differing descriptions, measurements, and interpretations can be compared without averaging them into a single “fact.”

ARCHIVAL FILTERS

5 characteristics

SOURCE COMPARISON

Reported Craft Appearance

HOW TO READ THIS →

CLAIM-138001reported

“Clark’s Papuda entry describes a bright oval-shaped object whose visible color changed from blue to red during the April 11, 1991 sighting.”

The UFO Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition: The Phenomenon from the Beginning

SRC-002099 · “Papuda Case” → “Visual appearance”, PDF p. 2129

SUPPORTS

CLAIM-138004reported

“Petronius reportedly said the radar return appeared rectangular on his screen; this screen description is recorded separately from the witnesses’ oval visual description and is not treated as literal hull shape.”

The UFO Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition: The Phenomenon from the Beginning

SRC-002099 · “Papuda Case” → “Radar-return appearance”, PDF p. 2130

SUPPORTS

Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.

SOURCE COMPARISON

Reported Craft Behavior

HOW TO READ THIS →

CLAIM-138002reported

“Lt. Damasceno reported that the object moved rapidly, remained no more than about 500 meters above the prison by his estimate, and flew upward, downward and horizontally while its light intensity varied.”

The UFO Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition: The Phenomenon from the Beginning

SRC-002099 · “Papuda Case” → “Maneuvers and altitude”, PDF p. 2129

SUPPORTS

CLAIM-138003reported

“CINDACTA flight controller Sgt. Petronius reportedly confirmed to Damasceno that he was following the object’s movement by radar.”

The UFO Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition: The Phenomenon from the Beginning

SRC-002099 · “Papuda Case” → “Radar confirmation”, PDF p. 2130

SUPPORTS

CLAIM-138005reported

“The CINDACTA controller reportedly calculated the tracked object’s velocity at 700 km/h.”

The UFO Encyclopedia, 3rd Edition: The Phenomenon from the Beginning

SRC-002099 · “Papuda Case” → “Radar-derived motion”, PDF p. 2130

SUPPORTS

Multiple claim rows are intentionally retained when sources disagree. ANOMALY does not silently reconcile competing values.